I don't really know what Site Advisor's problems are and, to be honest, I don't really care. My website is still in the gray of non-inspection due to their team's reputed "busy schedule." My patience is now exhausted with excuses from SA and their intermediaries, as I come to realize that their busy schedule is only equaled (maybe surpassed) by their lack of proper concern towards the very sites they advise for or against.
The following is a still unanswered letter I wrote (as a follow-up to an earlier one I had received) to this Site Advisor team of cavalier busyness:
Hello Again,
It's now almost eight weeks since I contacted you about my rating problem. I've tried to be considerate and patient but fear that your proposed eight weeks are destined to turn into ten, then twelve, then I don't know how many weeks and months, until my site is correctly listed with a green rating. I can easily understand the daunting task McAfee faces in rating the millions and billions of sites on the Internet; yet again, I was expecting a little more.
McAfee is one of the largest computer security corporations in the world, not some part time effort run by someone named Jethro from his log cabin in the Ozarks. Also, I'm merely operating a small personal blog, not hosting the National Archives at my site. I fail to understand the reason for such a delay, when it shouldn't take Site Advisor more than five minutes to check a site they've already checked. This is even more infuriating when I observe some of the most silly and unlikely (even questionable) sites with a green rating, when mine remains gray...due to no fault of my own, but because someone on my BlueHost server blew-out the works. Should I expect this every time a web host goes crazy and may take it into their head that the complete works of the Vatican would look good on his/her site? If this is so, Site Advisor itself is in the gray...not in the black of proficiency but in the red of deficiency and possibly open to corruption.
Sincerely,
Michael